The world has changed substantially since the days of the last arms race. Along with those global changes came a change in the strategies, tactics and weapons of global conflict. Today, it is inconceivable that any offensive actions associated with a coordinated effort (either clandestine or open, in-your-face, warfare) will not use multiple methods and modes of power projections and attack.
A recent discussion took place that centered on two of the many modes of power projection — cyber and economic. That discussion centered on to the following two constructs.
- Cyber power projection is greatly dependent on the technological capabilities of a nation's cyber researchers and warriors.
- Economic well-being and influence around the globe are greatly dependent on a nation's technological supremacy that results from their researchers, tech companies and infrastructure.
During that discussion, it was also noted that these two constructs are not mutually exclusive. Rather, they are tightly coupled. That discussion progressed until the question was asked, "Have we entered a new technology arms race, centered on who has access to the latest and greatest technology?"
Stop for a moment and think about the influence technology has all over the world. It has proven to be a significant driver of economic growth and it has shown to be one of the major deciding factors of modern conflict.
It certainly seem like we have entered a modern version of the arms race that took place during the Cold War. Nation-states, terrorist groups and others are actively seeking to use technology as an equalizer and/or force multiplier against their adversaries. If this is as it appears, shouldn't we recognize that we are in that race?
