How the military can get more out of artificial intelligence
The authors argue the military must remain educated and become the masters of AI instead of training to be its servants.
The authors argue the military must remain educated and become the masters of AI instead of training to be its servants.
The annual defense policy enacted 17 recommendations to improve U.S. artificial intelligence competitiveness. Now more work is needed, a congresswoman says.
Can we please do better than making acronyms like CJADC2?
Bryan Clark and Dan Patt from the Hudson Institute argue the U.S. military needs to evolve how it buys hardware and software or risk losing the tools required to defeat adversaries.
Contractors must embrace an unwavering commitment to implement security controls to effectively defend their IT infrastructures, a cybersecurity expert advises.
Military necessity, not politics, should guide the decision on whether to end the dual-hat arrangement, a cybersecurity researcher argues.
Keeping offensive and defensive cyber operations in silos results in exploitable weaknesses, according to three cyber experts.
"For anyone considering an investment in Ligado, I have a free piece of advice: buyer beware," writes Sen. Jim Inhofe, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman.
Ensuring secure communications, improved human-machine interfaces, and building more trust between humans and their AI agent partners are at the top of the list of persistent technological focus areas.
Since the Gulf War, unfriendly regimes have pursued counter-space capabilities to neutralize America's advantages. It’s imperative we prevent this from happening, a congressman argues in this commentary.